Yes, she's evil. And yes, if you re-arrange the words in 'evil,' you get vile. She's that, too. But slander and libel are wrong in all situations, if that is the case with an author's claim that Hillary was raped by Bill, resulting in Chelsea .

Honestly, a report like this does nothing more than discredit the author as a rumor-filled weasel. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for bringing Hillary down from her political highseat, but I don't think this is the right way to go about it. The problem with Ed Klein's claim about the rape in his new book, The Truth About Hillary, is the fact that an anonymous insider was the apparent whistleblower. Technically, it's all hearsay. There's no actual evidence presented that Hillary was raped; besides, even if she was, it's her business to go forward or to keep it quiet. Unless Klein has groundbreaking, concrete evidence that Bill Clinton raped his wife, it shouldn't be published under national scrutiny.

But that's just my opinion.

I may still buy the book, but I wonder how many other "earth-shattering" accusations based purely on hearsay are found within the read.

*this post was formulated after reading an article about an excerpt in Ed Klein's book. He may very well have solid evidence supporting his claims that are undisclosed as of yet.



*update* The Captain agrees.
*update* The Captain and I posted our respective opinions at the exact same time, 9:43 pm. Weird.